AI Safety: A Catalyst for Progress, not a Barrier - Altimetrik
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f8d0/7f8d0686757cbccedfbd977534b3d390bf36b033" alt=""
AI is transforming industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and IT, driving innovation and improving efficiency at an unprecedented pace.
While it has proven to reduce human errors and analyze trends for faster decision-making, it still struggles to earn users’ trust in its output. Additionally, further implementation of AI technology in businesses requires ensuring AI safety at all stages.
In this blog, we’ll dive deep into AI safety, explore why it is crucial, and discuss how to identify and address threats using the right tools.
What is AI safety and why do you need it?
AI safety involves protecting AI’s development and deployment and safeguarding against attacks, misuse, and accidental harm.
With proactive addressing of technological, ethical, and societal concerns, it strives to create reliable and robust AI systems.
- Prevent accidents and their consequences: It is crucial to implement proper safety measures, as AI systems can be vulnerable to manipulations like prompt injections.
e.g. Attempting to “jailbreak” the AI using specific prompts can lead to unexpected and harmful outcomes if not carefully managed. - Global security: It is crucial to protect against malicious AI abuse as it could affect cybersecurity, international relations, and national security.
- Ethical considerations: AI choices influence people’s lives, and algorithms may unintentionally contain prejudices and biases. Safety procedures ensure fairness and justice in decision-making based on AI outputs.
- Human well-being: From self-driving cars to medical care, the realm of AI is expanding exponentially. Therefore, ensuring safety is crucial to prevent harm to people and society.
Let’s categorize all risks into these three areas:
- Harm to People
- Individual Harm: This is when someone’s personal rights, safety, or opportunities are negatively affected.
e.g. An AI system wrongly accuses someone of fraud, ruining their reputation and access to financial services. - Group/Community Harm: This is when a group or community faces unfair treatment or discrimination.
e.g. An AI system rejects job candidates based on their race or name. - Societal Harm: This is when society as a whole is impacted, like when democratic systems or educational access are harmed.
e.g. AI-generated deepfakes spread misinformation during an election, influencing voters’ decisions.
- Individual Harm: This is when someone’s personal rights, safety, or opportunities are negatively affected.
- Harm to an Organization
This includes disruptions to daily operations, financial losses from security breaches, and harm to the organization’s public image.
e.g. A cyber-attack halts production at a factory, leading to financial losses and a damaged reputation when customer data is compromised. - Harm to an Ecosystem
Harm to systems that are interconnected, including the global financial system, supply chains, or essential resources.
e.g. A cyber-attack on a major shipping company disrupts global trade, affecting economies worldwide.
Addressing potential security threats in AI development involves identifying risks to individuals, organizations, and ecosystems. This requires innovative solutions to ensure the responsible deployment of advanced AI systems.
Next, let’s explore the possible security threats in AI and discuss how to address them with the right tools.
How do we address AI threats with the right tools?
From data collection to deployment, various safety and ethical issues may arise. To address these concerns, many innovative solutions are emerging to mitigate risks and ensure responsible AI deployment.
Here’s an example of architecture to illustrate potential security threats encountered during the development and deployment phases of an AI system.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1f33/b1f33a92ecc10ace348ba9829cb0893846587f2e" alt="image"
Fig: Threats in the development and deployment phase of an AI system
The table below details the threats identified in the architecture, along with possible measures and tools to mitigate them.
These tools for managing AI system threats align well with the management phase of the AI RMF (AI Risk Management Framework) developed by NIST.
What is an AI risk management Framework?
AI RMF is a structured process for identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks throughout the AI lifecycle. Therefore, it’s a core to enhance overall risk management efficacy.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29d2a/29d2a61d745c9e8fec011790b638e6643a557581" alt="image 1"
Fig: The four pillars of an AI Risk Management Framework
It comprises four functions: Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage. Let’s understand each function and its role in a nutshell below.
Govern:
- Organizations should establish and implement robust processes and policies to address AI risks, ensuring transparency and accountability.
- Ensure that the AI Actors (those who play an active role in the AI system lifecycle) are empowered, responsible, and trained to map, measure, and manage AI risks.
- Prioritize decisions based on AI risks throughout the lifecycle.
- Promote a safety-first culture among organizational teams, promptly addressing and communicating AI risks.
- Make sure policies and processes are in place to handle third-party software and data from AI risks.
Map:
- The business value context is established and understood.
- Categorize AI systems (e.g., classifiers, GENAI, recommenders).
- Understand system capabilities, usage, goals, and benefits.
- Map risks and benefits for each part of the AI system, including data and third-party software.
Measure:
- Identify AI risk measures and metrics.
- Evaluate AI systems for trustworthiness, social impact, and human-AI configurations.
- Establish procedures for tracking identified AI risks.
- Cluster and assess feedback on efficacy measurement.
Manage:
- Prioritize, respond to, and manage AI risks based on assessment and analytical output from map and measure functions.
- Plan, prepare, implement, and document strategies to minimize negative impacts.
- Manage both the benefits and hazards of AI from third parties.
- Risk treatments, including plans for response, recovery, and communication for identified and quantified AI threats, are routinely evaluated.
AI RMF offers a comprehensive strategy to tackle AI risks across a range of use cases and sectors and emphasizes responsible and trustworthy AI development and deployment.
Conclusion
Safety is paramount in the rapidly evolving field of AI, and robust measures are crucial for responsible use. By balancing innovation with ethics and safety, we can ensure a secure future for AI. Remember, AI safety is not a barrier to advancement but a necessary complement.